Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Laventure

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a “John Doe” criminal complaint and warrant are sufficient to toll a statute of limitations when the complaint and warrant were amended within approximately one week of issuance to reflect the actual identity of the alleged perpetrator. Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County which dismissed a criminal complaint against Appellee, Stephen Laven-ture, because the trial court deemed the complaint and warrant at issue untimely. Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Augustine FerroneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. CARDONICKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. United States v. Dennis Dean MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. John Doe A/K/A Ed, A/K/A Edward CarrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaventureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Com. v. Gupton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API