Legal Opinion
Liles v. Mulford Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 25, 1936No. 24888PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
A common-law 11. fa. in favor of H. K. Mulford Company was levied on an automobile as the property of H. D. Liles, who filed an affidavit of illegality alleging that the automobile was paid for with compensation money received by him as a World War veteran, and therefore was not subject to levy and sale under the fi. fa. On the trial in the justice’s court the plaintiff in fi. fa. tendered the execution together with the entry of levy thereon. The defendant in fi. fa. testified, over objection, that the automobile levied on was purchased with moneys received by him from the United States…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trotter v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Rucker v. MerckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- City of Atlanta v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- City Council v. RansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCurry v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- James v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 1942