United States v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
There was verdict of guilty on each count.
1Opinion of the CourtHundley, District Judge
(charging jury). This is an action brought by the United States to recover the sum of $200 claimed to have been incurred as penalties by the defendant for hauling two cars, which it is alleged did not comply with the requirements of the act of Congress known as the “Federal Safety Appliance Act.” This statute was enacted in 1893, and one of its provisions is that it is unlawful to use any car in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of a man going between the ends of the cars. This condition,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Transportation Union v. Drew Lewis, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Montana Cent. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.