Legal Opinion
State v. Shoemaker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 9, 1974No. 743-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
Defendants appeal their conviction for possession of more than 40 grams of controlled substances, i.e., marijuana and hashish.
The only issue on appeal is whether the controlled substances were obtained by law enforcement officers as a result of an illegal search and seizure.
*188On March 2, 1972, defendant Shoemaker, accompanied by defendant McDirmid, was driving his 1953 white Chevrolet panel truck south on United States Highway 195. Also traveling the same route that afternoon was Whitman County Deputy Sheriff Clift, driving an unmarked car bearing Idaho license plates. South of Spangle,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. BidegainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. BidegainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975