Legal Opinion

Gratzer v. Mahoney

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2006No. 05-075PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1 Karl Eric Gratzer, who was convicted of deliberate homicide in 1982 and who is presently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole (plus ten additional years for using a dangerous weapon while perpetrating the deliberate homicide) petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. As a preliminary matter, Gratzer challenges the constitutionality of § 46-22-101(2), MCA (2003), suggesting that the statute, by prohibiting a petitioner from challenging the validity of a sentence, impermissibly suspends the writ of habeas corpus. Substantively, Gratzer maintains…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkbrideMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Rozell R. CookMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. RickmanMontana Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API