Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Rolison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1946No. 9540PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

“This suit involves validity of tax judgment in favor of a home rule city, and legal and equitable rights to redeem, and waiver of any right of forfeiture city may have had.” (Appellants’ brief.) The case was tried to the court upon agreed statement of facts which shows:

The property was located in Sherman, a home rule city, that had by charter adopted “all lawful remedies for the enforcement of taxes.” It was the community property and homestead of E. W. and Nannie Neagle, husband and wife. On October 1, 1929, the City brought suit against the Neagles and one Peterson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregory v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Austin v. Sheppard, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Connor Bros. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. League v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of San Antonio v. EarnestTexas Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rolison v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API