Legal Opinion

Chapeze v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 16, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Case 74 — PETITION APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE LAW AND EQUITY COURT. Where A and B sign a note, and B is surety for A, and C signs, without the knowledge of B, designating himself as surety, as between B and C, B is liable for only one-half of the debt and C for the other.

Read the full summary

Case 74 — PETITION APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE LAW AND EQUITY COURT. Where A and B sign a note, and B is surety for A, and C signs, without the knowledge of B, designating himself as surety, as between B and C, B is liable for only one-half of the debt and C for the other. (McNeil v. Sanford, 3 B. M., 11.) The principal in a joint note signed by himself and surety may obtain as many additional sureties or guarantors as he chooses, and such sureties or guarantors may stipulate the terms of their liability as between themselves and prior parties, and such terms need not be in writing. (Bayles on…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion oe the court.

Joseph Gleason executed his note, payable to the German Insurance Bank, for the sum of five hundred, dollars, with Benj. Chapeze as his surety. There was nothing on the face of the note indicating the relation of the obligors the one to the other. They were joint-makers, but the bank knew that Chapeze was only surety. The bank, after the execution of the note, declined to discount the paper unless an additional name was procured by Gleason. The latter applied to the appellee, Bennett Young, to sign the paper as surety, and Young did so on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Salter v. Salter's CreditorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
  3. Robertson v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Sykes v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. McCollum v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Rose v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API