Legal Opinion

Deal v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2000No. 25052PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent entered a nolo contendere plea to possession of contraband by a prisoner. He was sentenced to two years to *456run consecutively to his active sentence. The post-conviction relief (PCR) judge granted respondent relief. We reverse.

ISSUE

Did the PCR judge err in granting respondent PCR?

DISCUSSION

Respondent was placed in lock-up on January 28, 1996, and entered a plea of nolo contendere on March 26, 1996. At the PCR hearing, respondent testified he pled guilty so that he would be released from lock-up. The PCR judge held respondent’s plea was involuntary. The State contends this was error.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. MunschSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Wicker v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kamarah Reynolds-Hall v. University of South Carolina, University of South Carolina Police Department, Holder Properties, Byron Gipson, Dan Goldberg, Shannon McKellar, USC PD Jacob Graf, and Chris GallmanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API