Deal v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Respondent entered a nolo contendere plea to possession of contraband by a prisoner. He was sentenced to two years to *456run consecutively to his active sentence. The post-conviction relief (PCR) judge granted respondent relief. We reverse.
ISSUE
Did the PCR judge err in granting respondent PCR?
DISCUSSION
Respondent was placed in lock-up on January 28, 1996, and entered a plea of nolo contendere on March 26, 1996. At the PCR hearing, respondent testified he pled guilty so that he would be released from lock-up. The PCR judge held respondent’s plea was involuntary. The State contends this was error.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kibler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. MunschSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Wicker v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992