Legal Opinion

Edaviel Corp. v. Boykin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 18, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The summary statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1425) provides: “If the precept contain a notice that demand is made in the petition for a judgment for rent in arrears, and the precept is served at least five days before the return day thereof, the court, upon rendering a final order, may determine the amount of rent due to the petitioner and give judgment for the amount found to be due. ’ ’

There is no provision in the summary statute for third-party practice.

The provisions for third-party practice contained in section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act are applicable to actions — not to summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erkins v. TuckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sessa v. BlakneyYonkers City Court · 1972
  2. Blackman v. WalkerNassau County District Court · 1970
  3. Gorman v. GormanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  4. Rothbaum v. EbelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  5. Manhattan Plaza, Inc. v. SnyderCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API