Legal Opinion
United States v. Strandlof
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 16, 2010No. 1:09-cr-00497PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION
BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter before me is defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Information [# 13] 1 filed December 2, 2009. Having considered the motion and response and their supplements, as well as the arguments and authorities presented by amicus curiae> 2 1 find and conclude that the statute under which defendant is charged is unconstitutional as a content-based restriction on First Amendment speech that is not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. Accordingly, I grant the motion.
Defendant is charged with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. SwisherDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- United States v. RobbinsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- United States v. StrandlofCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. KeplerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
- United States v. StrandlofCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.