Stuhlmiller v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
Arthur Stuhlmiller appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his claims against Nodak Mutual Insurance Company [“Nodak”] and Mark Stuhlmiller. We affirm.
On November 3, 1989, Arthur was injured in a one vehicle accident while riding as a passenger in his own vehicle, which was being driven by his son Mark. Arthur’s vehicle was insured by Nodak. Mark also had a separate automobile insurance policy issued by Nodak which provided underinsured motor vehicle coverage.
Arthur and Mark were both employed by Century Insurance Company [“Century”] and were acting in the course and scope…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Westman v. DessellierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Cormier v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Hoff v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Community Credit Union of New Rockford v. HomelvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hart Construction Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Habeck v. David MacDonald, M.D., P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.