Legal Opinion

Stuhlmiller v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1991No. Civ. 910019PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Arthur Stuhlmiller appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his claims against Nodak Mutual Insurance Company [“Nodak”] and Mark Stuhlmiller. We affirm.

On November 3, 1989, Arthur was injured in a one vehicle accident while riding as a passenger in his own vehicle, which was being driven by his son Mark. Arthur’s vehicle was insured by Nodak. Mark also had a separate automobile insurance policy issued by Nodak which provided underinsured motor vehicle coverage.

Arthur and Mark were both employed by Century Insurance Company [“Century”] and were acting in the course and scope…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Westman v. DessellierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cormier v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hoff v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sellie v. North Dakota Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Community Credit Union of New Rockford v. HomelvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hart Construction Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Habeck v. David MacDonald, M.D., P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API