Legal Opinion

Weisman v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*544There exists no basis to disturb the determination that petitioners did not sustain their burden of establishing entitlement to succession rights to the apartment held by petitioner Weisman’s mother; petitioner De La Cruz was the tenant’s common-law husband. The evidence demonstrates that petitioners’ occupancy was not pursuant to respondent’s written permission, and was not reflected in the affidavit of income submitted by Weisman’s mother in the year before she died (see Matter of Abreu v New York City Hous. Auth. E. Riv. Houses, 52 AD3d 432 [2008]). Weisman has not established that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Torres v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Barnhill v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Abreu v. New York City Housing Authority East River HousesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Ammar v. OlatoyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Martin v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API