Legal Opinion

Finch v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 1997No. CR 97-306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, Patricia Louise Finch, filed a motion to supplement the record in the above case. Appellant has filed a partial transcript, but seeks to supplement the record with affidavits of the deputy prosecuting attorney and appellant’s attorney. Appellant states that these affidavits show that a motion to exclude the attorney, whose assistance was at issue in the Rule 37 hearing, from court during appellant’s testimony was made in chambers; and appellant’s attorney concedes error in his affidavit regarding the failure to renew this motion for the record when the hearing began.

We remand the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API