Finch v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellant, Patricia Louise Finch, filed a motion to supplement the record in the above case. Appellant has filed a partial transcript, but seeks to supplement the record with affidavits of the deputy prosecuting attorney and appellant’s attorney. Appellant states that these affidavits show that a motion to exclude the attorney, whose assistance was at issue in the Rule 37 hearing, from court during appellant’s testimony was made in chambers; and appellant’s attorney concedes error in his affidavit regarding the failure to renew this motion for the record when the hearing began.
We remand the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999