Legal Opinion

American Const. Co. v. Kraft

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1924No. 8560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

Defendants in error, hereinafter styled appellees, brought this suit against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter styled appellants. Appellees sue as a partnership composed of W. O. Kraft, Gerome B. Cochran, and H. L. Houseman, doing business under the firm name and style of Cochran’s Insurance Agency. The defendant the American Construction Company is a cor<-poration organized under the laws of this state; the other defendants are John L. Wortham, Gus S. Wortham, and B. F. Car-ruth, a partnership conducting an insurance agency business under the firm name and style of John L. Wortham & Sons. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Mutual Film Corp. v. Morris & DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Goff v. SaxonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Armstrong v. Tidelands Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Stone v. Sterling Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Employers Cas. v. Mitchell, WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API