Weakly v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
—The bill alleges that Adám and Fred. Karsch, as partners under the style of Karsch & Co., were carrying on in Nashville the business of manufacturing furniture, complainants being at the time furniture dealers; that Karsh & Co., being short of money for•their business, applied to complainants for assistance, and they agreed to loan, and did loan them $2,000, “ on the express condition that K. & Co. would sell the complainants their manufactured furniture at a discount of 25 per cent, off of regular prices so long as K. & Co. used complainants’ money in their business. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sedgwick v. ClevelandNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
3Cited by1 opinion
- Erb v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877