Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 2009No. 4579PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

Stacy Howard appeals his conviction for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). Howard argues the trial court erred in: 1) declining to grant his motion for a mistrial; 2) refusing to recuse himself and interfering with Howard’s presentation of a defense by wrongfully removing relevant testimony; 3) admitting irrelevant evidence; 4) admitting Howard’s prior convictions into evidence; and 5) holding a probation revocation hearing and revoking Howard’s probation without a warrant. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

A Georgetown County grand jury indicted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. ColfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. GarrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API