Legal Opinion

Saskel v. Rubin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 25, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

The suit which gives rise to this appeal was to recover the amount due on a promissory note from the maker and endorser thereof.

The case was submitted to the court on,an agreed state of facts. The note was to secure the payment of $200, was dated May 4th, 1931, payable to Hoboken Loan Association, Inc., of which plaintiff-appellant is receiver by appointment of the Court of Chancery. It was made by Eli Rubin, defendant-respondent, and endorsed by his father, Ike Rubin, defendant. Various payments were made on the note reducing the amount due…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard Savings Bank v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. G. Magaro v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Howard Savings Bank v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API