Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Babb-Free

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1997No. A078749Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, J.

Petitioner and appellant Orange Pierson (Pierson) appeals from the denial of his petition to determine distribution rights in the estate of *439Jessie Lee Anderson (decedent). (Prob. Code, § 11700.) The primary issue is whether the trial court correctly applied the doctrine of estoppel to prevent Pierson, an undivorced bigamous spouse, from asserting his inheritance rights as a “surviving spouse” against the estate of his legally recognized first spouse who died intestate. We affirm, finding Pierson was properly estopped from claiming spousal inheritance rights.

Facts

The decedent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API