Legal Opinion

State v. Matrascia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1979No. Nos. 76-1816, 76-1874 and 76-1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

We are presented with a motion by the petitioner State of Florida, entitled “Motion for Enforcement of Mandate, or Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” We have considered the matter as a petition for a writ of mandamus, received a response from the respondents, Joseph and Josephina Matras-cia, and heard argument. The facts alleged in the petition, which are not contradicted by the response, are:

“(1) On September 22,1976, in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Judge Herbert Klein presiding, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Roy v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Ex Parte HydeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Reno v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ToledoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API