Legal Opinion

Murphy v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 1, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Hon. Fred O’Donnell, Judge. Suit in equity to reform and change two promissory notes executed by W. M. Fields & Bro. so that on their face they will be certificates of deposit on the First National Bank of Cedar Falls. There was a decree for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtBothrock, J.

The plaintiff is a farmer, and resides on his farm in Grundy county, fourteen miles' from the city of Cedar Falls. On the twenty-second day of September, 1891, he went to the place of business of the defendant bank, and gave his check on the Bank of Beinbeck for one thousand and twenty-five dollars, and paid one hundred and seventy-five dollars in money in addition, making an aggregate sum of one thousand two hundred dollars, for which he received a promissory note for that sum, payable one year from date, with interest at seven per cent, per annum. The note was signed W. M. Fields & Bro.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hervey v. SaverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. Wachendorf v. LancasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Gelpcke v. BlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Tufts v. LarnedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  5. Clute v. FrasierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rensink v. WiggersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Cataldo v. CompianoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Chapman v. DunwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Montgomery v. MannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API