People v. Bonilla-Barraza

In this interlocutory appeal brought under C.A.R. 4.1, the prosecution challenges the trial court's order suppressing statements *1092the defendant, Anselmo Bonilla-Barraza, made while in police custody.1 Police advised Bonilla-Barraza of his Miranda2 rights after taking him into custody. Bonil-la-Barraza then invoked his right to remain silent in two separate interviews, but police subjected him to further interrogation in both of those interviews and in a third interview.

We affirm the trial court's suppression order.3 We hold, under the totality of the cireumstances, that the police violated…