Legal Opinion
Angerome v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal *552injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 25, 1996, as denied her motion to compel the defendants to comply with her demand for discovery of items C, D, and E of the discovery rider.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
Evidence of post-accident repairs and remedial measures is not discoverable or admissible in a negligence case unless there is an issue of maintenance or control (see, Cleland v 60-02 Woodside Corp.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Klatz v. Armor Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cleland v. 60-02 Woodside Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bovich v. East Meadow Public LibraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sosa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- O'Hare v. BaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Graham v. Kone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Steinberg v. D. Waldner Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.