Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The determinative question presented is whether the Public Utilities Commission may authorize a public utility to levy a monetary penalty against its consumers.
The commission’s position is stated in the following portion of an order , which denied a rehearing to Dayton Flexible Prpducts Division of Baxter Laboratories in the instant matter:
• “* * * While that statute [R. C. 4909.161] does not specifically state that.the commission shall have the authority to levy penalties for consumption overruns or to delegate that authority* it seems repugnant to the. spirit and purpose of that provision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Ohio Bus Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977