Legal Opinion

Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. 75-971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The determinative question presented is whether the Public Utilities Commission may authorize a public utility to levy a monetary penalty against its consumers.

The commission’s position is stated in the following portion of an order , which denied a rehearing to Dayton Flexible Prpducts Division of Baxter Laboratories in the instant matter:

• “* * * While that statute [R. C. 4909.161] does not specifically state that.the commission shall have the authority to levy penalties for consumption overruns or to delegate that authority* it seems repugnant to the. spirit and purpose of that provision…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ohio Bus Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API