Legal Opinion

Freudenheim v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 4, 1954No. 58483; protest 224180-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This case involved an importation of diamonds from Antwerp. Plaintiff claims that due to a clerical error the diamonds were invoiced at $278 instead of $228 per carat. The case has been submitted on all the official papers, including the collector’s letter of transmittal. The collector’s letter is as follows:

This protest is lodged against the liquidation of the Collector which is based upon a value claimed by the protestant to be the result of a clerical error in the preparation of the invoice.

The invoice shows an item of 3.16 carats of diamonds at a unit value of $278 per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. H. A. Gogarty Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API