Legal Opinion

Julia Donelson Houston v. Ruth M. Thomas, State of Louisiana and Lake Providence Port Commission, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1991No. 90-1031PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

In a boundary dispute as treacherous as old man river itself, the appellants challenge the district court’s conclusion that accretions to the west bank of the Mississippi River are within the territorial boundaries of Mississippi. Finding that the district court erred in its initial placement of the boundary thalweg between Louisiana and Mississippi, we reverse and render judgment for the appellants.

Meandering Through the Courts: The Proceedings Upstream

At issue in phase one of this bifurcated case was the sovereign ownership of a mass of accretions lying along the west…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Missouri v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mississippi v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Houston (Julia Donelson) v. Thomas (Ruth M.), State of Louisiana, Lake Providence Port CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API