Ross v. Bank South, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAllgood, Senior District Judge
I
Recent precedent dictates that I concur with the majority's opinion affirming the *1005District Court decision to certify the class.1 It is not without some reluctance, however, that I join in the affirmance on this issue, as it again minimizes the need for individual reliance in securities fraud cases and thereby reduces the efficacy of disclosure statements in general.
Reliance has historically been an essential element of a fraud case under § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.2 Though proof of reliance has varied according to the type of securities fraud alleged,3 the basic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kirkpatrick v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.