Legal Opinion

Carlon v. Dixon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Douglas County. Both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the circuit court, upon a trial by the court without a jury. Briefly, the facts are these: Wm. Britt brought an action in replevin against Carlon, the present plaintiff, claiming the delivery to him of a horse which was in the possession of Carlon. To entitle and secure to Britt the immediate delivery of the property, the defendants Dixon and Dixon executed an undertaking, as sureties, for double the value of the property, “ for the prosecution of said action, for the return of the property to the defendant, if return thereof be adjudged, and for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Brainard v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Tayloe v. Thomson's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Clark v. BushNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  5. Gould v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1829

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Clark v. National Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Folen v. SaxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Stephen v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API