Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Mandel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 29, 1907No. Gen. No. 13,241Published

Action for breach of contract. Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. William H. Hinebaugh, Judge, presiding,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

A motion made by appellee to strike the so-called bill of exceptions from the files and to affirm the judgment of the trial court for want, of a sufficient bill of exceptions, was reserved to the hearing.

An examination of the record and the so-called bill of exceptions therein discloses that the same is not under the seal of the certifying judge. It is therefore not a bill of exceptions, as it fails to fulfil the functions of such an instrument in not being under seal. In this condition of the record—an omission as much the fault of the judge as the counsel, and undoubtedly an oversight of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. French v. HotchkissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Chicago & W. I. R. R. v. DeMarkoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API