Legal Opinion

Harford National Bank v. Gardner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by the Harford National Bank of Bel Air against Squire B. Gardner. On motion for a new trial and to set aside a verdict for defendant. Motion for new trial denied.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note in the hands of the plaintiff, who claims to be a holder in due course. The defense was fraud and deceit in the inception of the note, which constituted an infirmity in the instrument with notice to- the plaintiff. The verdict of the jury was for the defendant.

About March, 1911, the Proctor Slate Corporation purchased of the Proctor Slate Company, a corporation operating in slate quarries *850in Cardiff, Md., its property, which consisted at the time of “about 67 acres of land, a $15(1,000 mortgage, and a lot of talk.” The purchase price was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. American Exchange National Bank v. New York Belting & Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Cole v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. National Bank on Barre v. FoleyNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Oliner v. GoldenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dutch v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API