Legal Opinion

In re Irving Electrical Supply Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Under the order of confirmation which incorporated by reference the proposed amended plan of arrangement, the Court retained jurisdiction not only of the debtor but also of the debtor’s assets. Thus it is apparent that title to its assets did not revest in the debtor upon confirmation but said debtor continued to function as a debtor-in-possession, subject to control by the court. Although no express order of the Court was obtained permitting the debtor-in-possession to continue the business, this permission is clearly implied from a reading of the proposed amended plan…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Lambertville Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. In Re Avorn Dress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clinton Trust Co. v. John H. Elliott Leather Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. In Re California Eastern Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  3. In re Gelardin, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  4. In re Witt Dairy Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
  5. In re Michel, Maksik & Feldman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API