Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Hively

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1916No. 1014PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Moore County; D. B.. Hill, Judge. Trespass to try title by Solomon E. Hively and wife against C. F. Rudolph. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHaul, J.

This action was brought by Louisa A. Hively, joined pro forma by her husband, Solomon E. Hively, against C. F. Rudolph alone for title and possession of a certain quarter section of land in Moore county. She alleged that in a former suit against her and others, filed by defendant Rudolph, in thé district court of Moore county, styled C. F. Rudolph v. J. M. Roach, Louisa A. Filer et al., said Rudolph recovered a judgment against the said Louisa A. Filer for the land now in controversy; that during the pendency of said suit the said Louisa A. Filer had married Solomon E. Hively, and, by reason…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Frankel v. ByersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dutton v. CottonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William C. Davidson v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for United Bank of Texas, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Stubbs v. Lowrey's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Johnson v. FriersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Alamo Trust Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. BurckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API