Legal Opinion

Masheter v. Diver

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1969No. Nos. 69-195 and 69-196PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The primary question raised by these cases is: Where the Director of Highways, in a proceeding to appropriate land for purposes of widening a highway, files a Resolution and Finding to appropriate from the landowner a fee simple interest, and designates the interest sought *78as “all right, title and interest in fee simple,” without reservation or qualification, does such a taking include the right of ingress and egress to and from the landowner’s abutting property?

The appellants, at their respective trials, submitted the following special instructions to the jury which were given, over…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rothwell v. LinzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Bluebeard's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Wray v. WymerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Ochsenbine v. Village of CadizOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. City of Cleveland v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Director of Highways v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API