Legal Opinion

Bird v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The deceased was a school-teacher aged 27 years, and in the full enjoyment of all her faculties.

The defendant’s road crosses a highway running through the village, of Milford, the railroad running nearly north and south, and the highway running east and west. The depot stands west of'the railroad, and near the intersec-' tion of the road and the highway. There were across this highway a main track and a side track. A freight train was standing on the side track across the highway, waiting for the arrival of a passenger train, upon the arrival of which, as was the well-known custom, it…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fehnrich ex rel. Fehnrich v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lahnala v. Mineral Range Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Nagy v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Fehnrich ex rel. Fehnrich v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Pansik v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API