Legal Opinion · Dissent

W. B. Moses & Sons v. Lockwood

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 7, 1924No. 3788Published

1DissentSmith, Acting Associate Justice

I regret exceedingly that I find myself unable to agree with the dpinion of the learned Chief Justice as to the evidence and measure of damages which might be lawfully considered by the jury in reaching a verdict in this case.

The record discloses that the automobile in issue was a Roamer sedan, the possession of which was on the 29th day of April, 1918, transferred *942by the Roamer Sales Company to A. J. S. Moore by a written agreement of conditional sale, which expressly retained in the Roamer Sales Company the legal and equitable title to the car until $3,250, the purchase price, with interest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Rockefeller v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API