Burnside v. Futch
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
These two appeals involve different phases of the same litigation and have been consolidated in this court. In the more important of the two appeals, Case No. 5-1632, the basic issue is that of priority as between a judgment lien held by the appellants Burnside and a mortgage lien asserted by the appellee Farmerville Bank. The chancellor held that the bank’s mortgage is valid and that it constitutes a first lien against the property that both creditors are pursuing. We have concluded that the chancellor’s decision was erroneous, because the bank’s mortgage was discharged by payment on January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. MathisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Midland Valley Railroad v. Moran Bolt & Nut Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Bailey v. RockafellowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Anderson v. Southern Realty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peoples Bank of Imboden v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- In Re MancleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004