Legal Opinion

Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4 Inc. v. Goldstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the circumstances here shown, landlord had a right to terminate the lease by reason of tenant’s violation of the provisions of the occupancy agreement which prohibited harboring and maintaining animals in the demised premises (see Knolls Co-op. Section No. II v. Cashman, N. Y. L. J., March 5, 1963, p. 17, col. 3 [Supreme Ct., Bronx County, Kokh, J.], aifd. 19 A D 2d 789, affd. 14 N Y 2d 579). The evidence does not substantiate the claim of waiver or laches.

The final order should be reversed, without costs, and judgment directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition. If tenant…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilshire Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. KohlbrandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Jefferson Associates v. MillerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  3. Linden Hill No. 2 Cooperative v. LeskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Ocean Gate Associates Starrett Systems, Inc. v. DopicoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  5. Trump Village Sec. 3, Inc. v. RothsteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API