Legal Opinion
Credit Suisse First Boston v. Utrecht-America Finance Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
Defendants Utrecht-America Finance Co. (UAFC) and Cooperatieve Céntrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A., Rabobank Nederland (Rabobank) (collectively defendants) move for partial summary judgment establishing the measure of damages for which they may be liable. Plaintiff Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB or plaintiff) opposes.
Background
CSFB is a global investment bank. (Complaint 1Í 4.)
UAFC is a Delaware corporation and subsidiary of Rabobank. Rabobank is a global bank headquartered in the Netherlands. (Id. 1111 5, 6.)
UAFC had a $45 million interest in a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Simon v. Electrospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Credit Suisse First Boston v. Utrecht-America Finance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011