Legal Opinion

Underwriting Members of Lloyd's in Lloyd's Policy No. 52342 v. California Fruit Growers Exchange

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1943No. 10287Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

During 1937 one Jones was in the employ of appellee Fruit Growers Exchange. Between May 1 and November 1 of that year, through Jones’ defalcations, Fruit Growers suffered a loss of $23,019.22. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Com•pany had issued to the employer a fidelity bond, referred to in the record as the “primary bond,” limited in coverage to the sum of $1,000. This bond was in effect during the period of the defalcations. It contained no discovery clause, that is to say, it prescribed no time limit within which losses were required to be discovered in order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Bank of New Prague v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Swedish Methodist Aid Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API