Legal Opinion

Kentucky River Enterprises, Inc. v. Elkins

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2003No. 2002-SC-0622-WCPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

The workers’ compensation claimant whose application is the subject of this appeal did not retain the physical capacity to return to his past employment, but he did return to supervisory work for the same employer, earning the same hourly wage as at the time of his injury. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarded triple benefits, applying the 2000 version of KRS 342.730(l)(e)l and 2, and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Appealing, the employer maintains that the award of triple benefits was based upon an incorrect interpretation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Staples, Inc. v. KonvelskiKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Whittaker v. RobinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kroger v. LigonKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Plumley v. Kroger, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Tokico (USA), Inc. v. KellyKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. GSI Commerce v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
  5. Adkins v. Pike County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API