Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1940No. 30813PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMbssmore, J.

Plaintiff’s action is for damages for personal injuries received by him while in the employ of defendant. The jury returned a verdict for $5,000 in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant appeals.

This case comes under the federal employers’ liability act, and the liability imposed thereunder is for negligence. 45 U. S. C. A. secs. 51 et seq. The rights and obligations of the parties under the act depend upon it, and such liability is governed by pertinent opinions of the federal courts, which are binding on state courts. 45 U. S. C. A. sec. 51. Contributory negligence will not defeat a recovery, but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Wagner v. Watson Bros. Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Carlson v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Breen v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Draper v. Louisville N.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Borcherding v. EklundNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hoffman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wolfe v. MendelNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Patras Ex Rel. Patras v. WaldbaumNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fowler v. BachusNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API