Commonwealth v. Pittman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SHERTZ, Judge:
Following a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of Robbery and Terroristic Threats. Appellant waived his right to file post trial motions and trial counsel brought this appeal. Subsequently trial counsel was replaced and Appellant’s present counsel filed a brief raising ineffective assistance as the sole basis for a demand for a new trial. 1
Although issues not raised in post-verdict motions will not be considered on appeal, there is an exception where ineffective assistance of prior counsel is raised. In such a case, ineffectiveness of counsel must be raised at the earliest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. AbneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BroadwaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SpellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.