Sommer v. Compton
Oregon Supreme Court
On Motion to Retax Costs. For former opinion, see 52 Or. 173.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is a motion to retax costs. The judgment for the plaintiffs herein having been reversed, the defendants’ *342counsel filed in this court a verified statement of disbursements, containing, inter alia, the following charge:
“Cost of transcript of testimony, $59.”
The bill was served on plaintiffs’ counsel, and, although they filed no objection thereto, our clerk disallowed the item. To review that rejection this motion was interposed. In a supplemental affidavit the defendants’ counsel states that in the preparation of the bill of exceptions it was necessary to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Allen v. Standard Box & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Hammer v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- West v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- McGee v. BeckleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.