Legal Opinion

Sommer v. Compton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On Motion to Retax Costs. For former opinion, see 52 Or. 173.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a motion to retax costs. The judgment for the plaintiffs herein having been reversed, the defendants’ *342counsel filed in this court a verified statement of disbursements, containing, inter alia, the following charge:

“Cost of transcript of testimony, $59.”

The bill was served on plaintiffs’ counsel, and, although they filed no objection thereto, our clerk disallowed the item. To review that rejection this motion was interposed. In a supplemental affidavit the defendants’ counsel states that in the preparation of the bill of exceptions it was necessary to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. Standard Box & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hammer v. DowningOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Anderson v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. West v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McGee v. BeckleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API