Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Maehling

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1979No. 13739PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

Appellants, two members of the Crane School Board of Trustees, Yuma County, attacked the sufficiency of the recall petitions filed against them. The Yuma County Superior Court found the petitions sufficient to mandate the recall election. The case was brought on direct appeal to this court pursuant to A.R.S. § 19-208.04(B). We denied relief to the appellants in an order issued May 9, 1978 with a notation that a formal opinion would follow. The election took place on May 16. Appellees and appellee-intervenors then moved to dismiss this appeal on grounds of mootness. This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montoya v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Whitman v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Olathe Hospital Foundation, Inc. v. Extendicare, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Abbey v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. Hall v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Franklin Bruce Ross v. Ken BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Clarke v. RossDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2012
  4. Green v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Green v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API