United States v. Abelardo Niebla-Torres
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Mexican national Abelardo Niebla-Tor-res (Niebla) appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(D), and 846. The district court found Niebla guilty after a bench trial. On appeal, Niebla argues that the district court erred by: (1) permitting the prosecution to authenticate items of physical evidence with hearsay testimony; and (2) admitting evidence of a prior smuggling arrest under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Brothers Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Diana Estrada, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steaven Martin BASINGER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jose Luis CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jose Juan Ramirez-RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.