Legal Opinion
Martin-Trigona v. Brooks & Holtzman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 9, 1982No. 82 Civ. 4587PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
A common courtesy by Daniel J. Brooks, an attorney admitted to practice in this Court — the moving of the admission pro hac vice of Richard Coan, an out-of-state attorney, pursuant to General Rule 2(c) of the Southern District — has triggered this action. Rule 2(c) provides:
A member in good standing of the bar of any state or of any United States district court, may upon motion be permitted to argue or try a particular cause in whole or in part as counsel or advocate. Only an attorney of this court may enter appearances for parties, sign stipulations or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rex Applegate v. Top Associates, Inc., Theodore O. ProunisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martin-Trigona v. LavienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Sassower v. SignorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In Re WHET, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Beker Industries Corp. v. Florida Land & Water Adjudicatory Commission (In Re Beker Industries Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Martin-Trigona v. LavienDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.