Legal Opinion

State v. Mau

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1930No. 1600PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

The defendant appeals from a judgment following a verdict finding him guilty of rape. The information, based on Section 7080, C. S. 1920, charged that Carl Mou, on January, 19, 1929, at Hot Springs County, Wyoming, “did wilfully, maliciously, unlawfully, forcibly and feloniously have carnal knowledge, and did then and there ravish a female child one Norma Cox then and, there being under the age of eighteen years and of the age of thirteen years. ’ ’ The defendant’s name is Carl Man, and the girl’s name is Naomi Cox, hut no question has been raised as to the mistake in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. People v. WilmotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mortimore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HolmWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Elmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API