Rosenberg v. Bricken
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Latimer
-Affirming.
The question. Is it absolutely essential that process be served on the guardian ad litem appointed for in fant defendants for the purpose of service, or may the guardian ad litem waive the service and enter his appearance, thereby bringing the infant defendants before the court?
This action was brought under the declaratory judgment act for the purpose of testing' the validity of the appeal and the verdict setting aside the will of Sallie Letcher Bricken in a former action insofar as the infants are concerned; for a construction of the will of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grooms v. GroomsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Herr v. Humphrey, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Rachford v. RachfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Swift Coal & Timber Co. v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Brown v. Allen's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Biaggi v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- Potter v. Breaks Interstate Park CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Thurman v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- Proctor v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.