Legal Opinion

Aljak v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-2183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to armed robbery. We reverse and remand for a new trial because the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on duress.

Shortly after a robbery, appellant and his three passengers were stopped by the police, and the robbery victim, who was brought to the scene, identified the passengers as having committed the robbery. Appellant, who was at the wheel, was not identified as having participated in the robbery, and told one of the police officers at the scene that he had not been aware that a robbery had taken place.

Appe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Koontz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Cawthon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Corujo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mickel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. McGlynn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. LEWIS DARREN FRANKLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API