Legal Opinion
Trustees System Co. of Pennsylvania v. Payne
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 1, 1933No. 5077-5081PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from like decrees of the District Court appointing receivers for the five defendant corporations in very exceptional circumstances. The questions involved are jurisdictional. As questions of jurisdiction are to be determined from the allegations of the bills, not from the facts as they may turn out, Mosher v. City of Phoenix, 287 U. S. 29, 30, 53 S. Ct. 67, 77 L. Ed. 148, and rest accordingly on whether the allegations set forth a substantial claim in equity, Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289' U. S.-, 53 S. Ct. 549, 77 L. Ed.-, we shall decide…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward DrathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Stone v. EachoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Commerce Trust Co. v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Metropolitan Holding Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.