Monroe Motor Express v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The contention of the defendant Motor Express, that the original petition did not contain enough to amend by, and that the court erred in allowing the plaintiff to amend it, is not well taken. “A petition showing a plaintiff and' a defendant, and setting out sufficient to indicate and specify some particular fact or transaction as a cause of action, shall be enough to amend by.” Code, § 81-1302. The cause of action declared on in the original petition was the death of the plaintiff’s husband, which the petition alleged was the proximate result of specified…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Waller v. Southern Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Moore v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Rowe v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DI Corbett Electric, Inc. v. Venture Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Jones v. Roberts Marble Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Williams v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1992
- Monroe Motor Express v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Robert J. Sheldon and Joan M. Sheldon, Doing Business as World Bazaar of Southlake v. Munford, Incorporated, a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.